# What is the typical pricing model for Low-Code & No-Code software?

Category: Low-Code & No-Code. Intent: transactional. Top brand: Microsoft Power Apps.

Page: https://slateindex.ai/prompt/what-is-the-typical-pricing-model-for-low-code-and-no-code-wgjiqqq4uv · data of 2026-11-03

## Brands named

| Brand | Share of engines |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Apps | 33% |
| Zapier | 33% |
| OutSystems | 33% |
| Bubble | 33% |
| Webflow | 33% |
| Mendix | 33% |
| Glide | 33% |
| Kissflow | 33% |
| Retool | 33% |
| Zoho | 33% |

## Sources

- ainformat.com (2)
- costbench.com (2)
- ciopages.com (1)
- dazzm.com (1)
- easiiodev.ai (1)
- everestgrp.com (1)
- forasoft.com (1)
- getdevstudio.com (1)
- kissflow.com (1)
- microsoft.com (1)
- oflight.co.jp (1)
- outsystems.com (1)
- paloozalabs.com (1)
- thecompetenza.com (1)
- vaultinnovation.com (1)
- vendorbenchmark.com (1)

## Definitions

- Visibility (0–100): how often and how high AI answers name the brand, weighted by position.
- Mention rate: share of collected AI answers that name the brand.
- Share of voice: the brand's mentions as a share of all brand mentions in the category.
- Citation authority: share of answers naming the brand that cite the brand's own site.

Cite as: SlateIndex, “What is the typical pricing model for Low-Code & No-Code software?”, https://slateindex.ai/prompt/what-is-the-typical-pricing-model-for-low-code-and-no-code-wgjiqqq4uv, data of 2026-11-03. Licence: CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).