# What is the typical pricing model for Proposals & Contracts software?

Category: Proposals & Contracts. Intent: transactional. Top brand: Salesforce.

Page: https://slateindex.ai/prompt/what-is-the-typical-pricing-model-for-proposals-and-ngqhyxvtuv · data of 2026-11-02

## Brands named

| Brand | Share of engines |
|---|---|
| PandaDoc | 100% |
| Zoho | 67% |
| Plutio | 33% |
| Salesforce | 33% |
| Better Proposals | 33% |
| Qwilr | 33% |
| Loopio | 33% |
| Proposify | 33% |
| Ironclad | 33% |
| Concord | 33% |

## Sources

- pandadoc.com (4)
- zoho.com (3)
- stackkite.com (2)
- betterproposals.io (1)
- concord.app (1)
- dilitrust.com (1)
- docsaura.com (1)
- fitgap.com (1)
- gixo.ai (1)
- ironcladapp.com (1)
- laratranslate.com (1)
- monday.com (1)
- plutio.com (1)
- proposify.com (1)
- rocketdocs.com (1)
- softwareadvice.com (1)
- winacontract.com (1)

## Definitions

- Visibility (0–100): how often and how high AI answers name the brand, weighted by position.
- Mention rate: share of collected AI answers that name the brand.
- Share of voice: the brand's mentions as a share of all brand mentions in the category.
- Citation authority: share of answers naming the brand that cite the brand's own site.

Cite as: SlateIndex, “What is the typical pricing model for Proposals & Contracts software?”, https://slateindex.ai/prompt/what-is-the-typical-pricing-model-for-proposals-and-ngqhyxvtuv, data of 2026-11-02. Licence: CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).