# Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend?

Category: Low-Code & No-Code. Intent: commercial. Top brand: Microsoft Power Apps.

Page: https://slateindex.ai/prompt/which-low-code-and-no-code-vendors-do-analysts-recommend-3zkfbn6gvw · data of 2026-11-03

## Brands named

| Brand | Share of engines |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Apps | 100% |
| OutSystems | 100% |
| Mendix | 100% |
| Salesforce | 100% |
| Appian | 100% |
| ServiceNow | 100% |
| Retool | 100% |
| Creatio | 100% |
| Pega | 67% |
| GitHub Copilot | 33% |
| UiPath | 33% |
| Zoho | 33% |
| Bubble | 33% |
| Webflow | 33% |
| Glide | 33% |
| Airtable | 33% |
| AppSheet | 33% |

## Sources

- gartner.com (5)
- forrester.com (4)
- outsystems.com (2)
- salesforce.com (2)
- ciopages.com (1)
- gem-corp.tech (1)
- netsolutions.com (1)
- newwavesolution.com (1)
- pcmag.com (1)
- techsciresearch.com (1)
- viewpointanalysis.com (1)

## Definitions

- Visibility (0–100): how often and how high AI answers name the brand, weighted by position.
- Mention rate: share of collected AI answers that name the brand.
- Share of voice: the brand's mentions as a share of all brand mentions in the category.
- Citation authority: share of answers naming the brand that cite the brand's own site.

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend?”, https://slateindex.ai/prompt/which-low-code-and-no-code-vendors-do-analysts-recommend-3zkfbn6gvw, data of 2026-11-03. Licence: CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).