360Learning vs CYPHER Learning
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
360Learning is the stronger AI pick in Learning Management: it has a visibility score of 19.2 versus 2.5 for CYPHER Learning, and ranks ahead in 25% of the answers that name both.
Choose 360Learning if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.2 vs 2.5)
- You need GDPR or ISO 27001 or SOC 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose CYPHER Learning if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Built for enterprise and corporate training tracking
- Competency-based and automated course creation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 360Learning | CYPHER Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.2% | 2.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Learning Management | #5 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 6.6% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
360Learning 0pp · CYPHER Learning 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
360Learning leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | 360Learning | CYPHER Learning |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Learning Management System tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #6 | #4 |
| Best learning management system with AI features | AI Mode | #3 | #2 |
| Official website of the top learning management system vendors | ChatGPT | #5 | #16 |
| Where can I sign up for a learning management system? | AI Mode | #7 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 360Learning | CYPHER Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $8 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | No |
| Integrations | — | 1000+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2 | — |
| Support | Dedicated technical support teams, Priority SLA and support, Premium onboarding and dedicated account management, Live customer webinars and knowledge base | 24/7 AI support, 24/7 ticket submission, Online knowledge base, Built-in learner help desk |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | Plano, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | French government grant (France 2030), amount reported inconsistently · $240M raised | Growth equity led by Invictus Growth Partners · $40M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise organizations that need to scale learning quickly while keeping it relevant and engaging | Organizations that must train distributed audiences at scale, including employees, partners, customers, agents, dealers, franchise networks and training companies. |
Plans side by side
360Learning
CYPHER Learning
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
360Learning
- Collaborative, peer-driven learning
- Subject matter experts rapidly build and share courses
- Lets employees contribute to training content
- AI-powered collaborative learning
- Strong user reviews and recommendations
CYPHER Learning
- Built for enterprise and corporate training tracking
- Competency-based and automated course creation
- AI-native skill lifecycle management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “360Learning vs CYPHER Learning”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/360learning-vs-cypher-learning, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.