AgencyAnalyticsClient reporting and performance insights for marketing agencies
vs
MetabaseOpen source AI analytics you can verify
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2
AgencyAnalytics vs Metabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Metabase is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 21.7 versus 0 for AgencyAnalytics.
Choose AgencyAnalytics if…
- You want a lower entry price ($20 vs $100)
- all-in-one marketing reporting and dashboards
- strong client reporting for small and midsize agencies
Choose Metabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.7 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (237+ vs 90+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (63% vs 0% positive)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | AgencyAnalytics | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 21.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #40 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 5.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 63% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AgencyAnalytics 0pp · Metabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Metabase leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgencyAnalyticsMetabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AgencyAnalytics ranked higher
0Metabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AgencyAnalytics | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $20 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted or Metabase Cloud, with air-gapped deployment available on Enterprise |
| Integrations | 90+ | 237+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Standard support by email and chat, Free onboarding call | Email, Support form, Slack, Microsoft Teams |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Ontario, Canada | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series B · $43M raised |
| Best for | Marketing agencies that report on client campaigns across several channels | Teams that want self-service analytics without relying on engineers, and software companies that need to embed analytics in their product |
Plans side by side
AgencyAnalytics
Core Plan$20per client, per month (billed annually)
Volume PricingCustom25+ clients, contact sales
Metabase
Open Source$0free, self-hosted, unlimited users
Starter$100month (5 users included, +$6/user/month)
Pro$575month (10 users included, +$12/user/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing (starts at $20,000 / year)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AgencyAnalytics
- all-in-one marketing reporting and dashboards
- strong client reporting for small and midsize agencies
- not suited to deep analytics or data warehousing
Metabase
- Free open-source edition for self-hosting
- Easy to deploy and user-friendly
- No-code visual builder and SQL for non-technical users
- Affordable, low-cost BI
- Best default starting point for startups and small teams
- Self-hosting means handling hosting, security, backups and updates yourself
- Extra token-based AI or custom usage fees on top of plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AgencyAnalytics vs Metabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agencyanalytics-vs-metabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.