AgnoThe agent platform that builds itself
vs
LlamaIndexTurn any document into agent-ready context.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Agno vs LlamaIndex
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LlamaIndex is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.2 versus 0 for Agno.
Choose Agno if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 20% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- free open-source runtime
Choose LlamaIndex if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.2 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($50 vs $150)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Agno | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 2.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #73 | #41 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agno 0pp · LlamaIndex 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LlamaIndex leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgnoLlamaIndex
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Agno ranked higher
0LlamaIndex ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agno | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $150 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $50 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted in your own cloud, on-premise or locally, as a container | LlamaParse runs as SaaS on a secure cloud tenant, or can be deployed in a customer's private VPC across cloud providers. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Community and forums, Email support, Slack Connect and service SLA (Enterprise) | Community, Basic (email), Priority (Slack Connect), Dedicated |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed | Strategic minority equity investments (Databricks, KPMG) · $28M raised |
| Best for | Teams building and running agents in their own cloud, from solo builders to Fortune 5 companies | Teams in document-heavy industries such as finance, insurance, healthcare and manufacturing that need accurate parsing of complex tables, charts and scanned pages. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agno
- free open-source runtime
- no per-event, token, or compute charges
LlamaIndex
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agno vs LlamaIndex”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agno-vs-llamaindex, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.