AgnoThe agent platform that builds itself
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Agno vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for Agno.
Choose Agno if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 42% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- free open-source runtime
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Agno | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #73 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agno 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgnoOutSystems
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Agno ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agno | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $150 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted in your own cloud, on-premise or locally, as a container | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Community and forums, Email support, Slack Connect and service SLA (Enterprise) | — |
| Founded | — | 2001 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | Teams building and running agents in their own cloud, from solo builders to Fortune 5 companies | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agno
- free open-source runtime
- no per-event, token, or compute charges
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agno vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agno-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.