Skip to content
SlateIndex
AirwallexThe intelligent financial platform for global businesses
vs
SAP ConcurSimple, connected spend & travel management
Comparison · Expense Management · weekly run Nov 2

Airwallex vs SAP Concur

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SAP Concur is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 40.8 versus 8 for Airwallex, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.

Choose Airwallex if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 40% positive)
  • You need PCI DSS Level 1 coverage
  • Transparent pay-as-you-go pricing
  • No setup or hidden platform fees for basic features

Choose SAP Concur if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.8 vs 8)
  • You need ISO-certified information security management system (ISMS) or ISO-certified business continuity management system (BCMS) or PCI DSS, Visa Level 1 or SOC 1 Type II or FedRAMP Authorized (Concur Cloud for Public Sector) or Spain ENS coverage
  • Enterprise-grade travel, invoice, and expense tracking
  • Widely used market leader in expense management

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Airwallex SAP Concur
Visibility score8%40.8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Expense Management#11#3
Share of voice2.9%10%
Mentions this run1548
Positive in AI answers50%40%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Airwallex 8%

Airwallex 0pp · SAP Concur 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SAP Concur leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2%
44.3%
AI Mode
4.8%
54.8%
Perplexity
17.2%
23.3%
AirwallexSAP Concur

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

2Airwallex ranked higher
5SAP Concur ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAirwallexSAP Concur
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceFree; paid from $12 per seat / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentCloud-native platform accessible via desktop and mobileCloud-based (SaaS)
Integrations—300+
CompliancePCI DSS Level 1, SOC 2 Type IIISO-certified information security management system (ISMS), ISO-certified business continuity management system (BCMS), PCI DSS, Visa Level 1, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Authorized (Concur Cloud for Public Sector), Spain ENS
SupportHelp centre articles and FAQs, Email support, Dedicated account manager, Onboarding supportGuided onboarding, Administrator training for IT and finance leads, Self-service knowledge base
Founded2015—
HeadquartersCo-headquartered in San Francisco and Singapore—
Employees1,001–5,000—
FundingSeries H · $1702M raisedPIPE (private placement) deals, 2002-2011
Best forGlobal businesses that want to save time and money on cross-border payments, FX, spend and billing as they scaleBusinesses of all sizes, from small companies to large multinationals

Plans side by side

Airwallex

Explore$0user/month
Grow$12user/month + platform fee based on team size
AccelerateCustomcustom pricing
Airwallex pricing

SAP Concur

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Airwallex

  • Transparent pay-as-you-go pricing
  • No setup or hidden platform fees for basic features
  • Free entry tier available
  • Recommended for global finance teams and businesses

    SAP Concur

    • Enterprise-grade travel, invoice, and expense tracking
    • Widely used market leader in expense management
    • Strong global compliance and ERP integration
    • Best fit for large, multinational enterprises
    • Steeper learning curve and less intuitive interface
    • Per-report fees based on usage volume
    • Long, heavier implementation of six to twelve weeks or more
    • Custom demos and trials on request, not self-serve
    • Pricing requires custom sales quotes rather than transparent rates

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Airwallex vs SAP Concur”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/airwallex-vs-sap-concur, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.