Amazon OpenSearchManaged retrieval engine for agentic AI, search, and analytics
vs
QdrantOpen-Source Vector Search Engine written in Rust
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
Amazon OpenSearch vs Qdrant
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qdrant is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 60.5 versus 0 for Amazon OpenSearch.
Choose Amazon OpenSearch if…
- You need HIPAA eligible or PCI DSS or SOC or ISO or FedRAMP or DoD CC SRG or CSA STAR or FIPS 140-2 or ISO 27017 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Qdrant if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.5 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA coverage
- High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Amazon OpenSearch | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 60.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #28 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 13.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 63 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 68% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Amazon OpenSearch 0pp · Qdrant 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qdrant leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Amazon OpenSearchQdrant
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Amazon OpenSearch ranked higher
0Qdrant ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Amazon OpenSearch | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Fully managed clusters or the Serverless option | Managed cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud (air-gapped), self-hosted on-premises, and edge |
| Compliance | HIPAA eligible, PCI DSS, SOC, ISO, FedRAMP, DoD CC SRG, CSA STAR, FIPS 140-2, ISO 27017 | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA |
| Support | — | Community support via Discord on the free tier, Standard tier: email and ticket portal, 10x5 business hours, Premium tier: 24/7 support with private Slack, Discord or Teams channels, Enterprise tier: custom response SLA and advisory services |
| Founded | — | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series B · $88M raised |
| Best for | — | Developers and teams building RAG, semantic search and recommendation systems that need hybrid search and metadata filtering, either self-hosted or managed |
Plans side by side
Amazon OpenSearch
Pricing not available.
Qdrant
Free Tier$0forever
Standard TierCustomusage-based
Premium TierCustomminimum spend required
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Amazon OpenSearch
Profile in progress.
Qdrant
- High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
- Strong metadata and complex payload filtering
- Free tier for prototyping and testing
- Open-source option with flexible self-hosting
- Strong default choice for startups and production RAG
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Amazon OpenSearch vs Qdrant”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazon-opensearch-vs-qdrant, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.