Amazon OpenSearch vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 0 for Amazon OpenSearch.
Choose Amazon OpenSearch if…
- You need HIPAA eligible or PCI DSS or SOC or ISO or FedRAMP or DoD CC SRG or CSA STAR or FIPS 140-2 or ISO 27017 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Amazon OpenSearch | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #28 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Amazon OpenSearch 0pp · Supabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Amazon OpenSearch | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Fully managed clusters or the Serverless option | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | HIPAA eligible, PCI DSS, SOC, ISO, FedRAMP, DoD CC SRG, CSA STAR, FIPS 140-2, ISO 27017 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | — | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | — | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Amazon OpenSearch
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Amazon OpenSearch
Profile in progress.
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Amazon OpenSearch vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazon-opensearch-vs-supabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.