Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppfarmBuild custom software without becoming a software company.
vs
AppSheetBuild apps with no code
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Appfarm vs AppSheet

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 4.6 for Appfarm, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Appfarm if…

  • You need ISO 27001 coverage
  • Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes

Choose AppSheet if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 4.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
  • Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appfarm AppSheet
Visibility score4.6%6.7%
Change vs last weekdown−0.7%up+1.5%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#23#14
Share of voice1.9%1.9%
Mentions this run1111
Positive in AI answers0%26%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Appfarm 5%

Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · AppSheet +1.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

AppSheet leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
4.1%
AI Mode
2.8%
6.3%
Perplexity
10.2%
9.6%
AppfarmAppSheet

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

0Appfarm ranked higher
2AppSheet ranked higher
PromptEngineAppfarmAppSheet
Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms Perplexity#17#10
Best low-code platform with AI features Perplexity#13#7

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppfarmAppSheet
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentManaged cloudCloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform
ComplianceISO 27001SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018
SupportCommunity, Email, Service managerAppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan)
Founded2018—
HeadquartersOslo, Norway—
Employees51–200—
FundingCapital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raisedSeries A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates
Best forOperations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development teamBusinesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace.

Plans side by side

Appfarm

Pricing not available.

AppSheet

Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
AppSheet pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appfarm

  • Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes

    AppSheet

    • Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
    • Affordable low-code option
    • Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
    • Suits organisations on Google Workspace
    • Connects apps to existing business systems
    • Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs AppSheet”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-appsheet, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.