Appfarm vs AppSheet
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 4.6 for Appfarm, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appfarm if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 4.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appfarm | AppSheet |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 6.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | up+1.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #23 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 26% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · AppSheet +1.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appfarm | AppSheet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | Perplexity | #17 | #10 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #13 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appfarm | AppSheet |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | Community, Email, Service manager | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) |
| Founded | 2018 | — |
| Headquarters | Oslo, Norway | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Capital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raised | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates |
| Best for | Operations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development team | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. |
Plans side by side
Appfarm
Pricing not available.
AppSheet
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appfarm
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs AppSheet”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-appsheet, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.