AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
KissflowAI-powered enterprise no-code and low-code platform.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
AppSheet vs Kissflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kissflow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 6.7 for AppSheet.
Choose AppSheet if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
Choose Kissflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 6.7)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or HIPAA or CCPA coverage
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | down−5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kissflow leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppSheetKissflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AppSheet ranked higher
0Kissflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | Public and private cloud hosting |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Dedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation |
| Founded | — | 2003 |
| Headquarters | — | Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Angel · $1M raised |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Large enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform. |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
Kissflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Kissflow
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
- ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
- highly rated by business technologists and process owners
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Kissflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-kissflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.