AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
LovableLow-Code & No-Code
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
AppSheet vs Lovable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 1.7 for Lovable.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 1.7)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
Choose Lovable if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 26% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2022 or AIUC-1 coverage
- rapid prototyping and idea validation
- generates working software from plain-English descriptions
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Lovable +0.09999999999999987pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppSheetLovable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AppSheet ranked higher
0Lovable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | Cloud-hosted platform operated by Lovable, also available through Google Cloud Marketplace and Gemini Enterprise. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, AIUC-1 |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | — | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Series C · $950M raised |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | People without a deep coding background who want to build apps and websites quickly, and enterprise teams that need admin and security controls. |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
Lovable
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Lovable
- rapid prototyping and idea validation
- generates working software from plain-English descriptions
- AI-generated code you can eventually own
- listed among top low-code and no-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Lovable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-lovable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.