AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
AppSheet vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 3.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $25)
- AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 18% positive)
- You need HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
Choose Supabase if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppSheetSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1AppSheet ranked higher
0Supabase ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | AppSheet | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | ChatGPT | #11 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.