AWSVisual low-code tool for building AWS-backed apps from Figma designs
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
AWS vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AWS is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 8.2 versus 5.7 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.2 vs 5.7)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or ISO 9001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
Choose Supabase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (18% vs 16% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 8.2% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #9 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 16% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS 0pp · Supabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AWS leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AWSSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1AWS ranked higher
1Supabase ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top vector database options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #6 | #7 |
| Where can I sign up for a vector database? | AI Mode | #8 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, PCI DSS Level 1, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, ISO 9001, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | — | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | — | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
AWS
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
- Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
- Pay-as-you-go, usage-based pricing
- Deep integration with the AWS ecosystem and AI tools
- Recognised by analysts such as Gartner and ISG
- Requires strong AWS engineering or technical expertise
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-vs-supabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.