ChartbeatAnalytics and optimization tools for digital content creators
vs
GoAccessVisual Web Log Analyzer
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Chartbeat vs GoAccess
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GoAccess is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0 for Chartbeat.
Choose Chartbeat if…
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose GoAccess if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Chartbeat | GoAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #41 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Chartbeat 0pp · GoAccess 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GoAccess leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ChartbeatGoAccess
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Chartbeat ranked higher
0GoAccess ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Chartbeat | GoAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Runs in a terminal on *nix systems or through a browser, and can run against an access log file or live log input. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | — |
| Support | Dedicated Account Manager on Essentials and higher plans | — |
| Founded | 2009 | — |
| Headquarters | Austin, TX | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Seed (led by Index Ventures) · $38M raised | — |
| Best for | Digital publishers, newsrooms, editorial teams and marketing teams at media brands | System administrators who need fast visual statistics and security monitoring from web server logs, including over SSH. |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Chartbeat vs GoAccess”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/chartbeat-vs-goaccess, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.