Skip to content
SlateIndex
ChromaOpen-source search infrastructure for AI
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2

Chroma vs Supabase

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Chroma is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 18.6 versus 5.7 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Chroma if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (18.6 vs 5.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 18% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose Supabase if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $250)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Chroma Supabase
Visibility score18.6%5.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Vector Databases#6#12
Share of voice6.8%2.2%
Mentions this run3211
Positive in AI answers50%18%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Chroma 19%

Chroma 0pp · Supabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Chroma leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
22.2%
10.4%
AI Mode
20.9%
5.9%
Perplexity
12.6%
0.9%
ChromaSupabase

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

3Chroma ranked higher
3Supabase ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionChromaSupabase
Pricing modelUsage-basedFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $250 / moFree; paid from $25 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentOpen-source self-hosted, serverless managed Chroma Cloud, or Bring Your Own Cloud in the customer's VPC.Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available)
SupportCommunity support through Discord and the open-source community on the Starter plan, Slack support on the Team plan, Dedicated support and customized SLAs on the Enterprise planCommunity support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan)
Founded20222020
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesRemote-first, United States
Employees11–50201–500
FundingSeed · $18M raisedSeries D · $1000M raised
Best forDevelopers building retrieval-augmented generation prototypes, who get a fast start locally, and teams that later need a managed or self-hosted search system.Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend

Plans side by side

Chroma

Starter$0month + usage
Team$250month + usage
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Chroma pricing

Supabase

Free$0month
Pro$25month
Team$599month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Supabase pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Chroma

  • Fast path from local notebook prototyping to serverless cloud production
  • Free and open source when self-hosted
  • Lightweight and developer-friendly for prototypes
  • Best for local development, prototyping and MVPs
  • Good for small-to-medium RAG and semantic search applications
  • Not suited to high-scale production workloads

Supabase

  • Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
  • Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
  • Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
  • Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
  • Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Chroma vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/chroma-vs-supabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.