Cisco Duo vs Transmit Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cisco Duo is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 16.5 versus 0.7 for Transmit Security.
Choose Cisco Duo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.5 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need FedRAMP High (Duo Federal) or FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal) or GovRAMP or TX-RAMP or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Transmit Security if…
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cisco Duo | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.5% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #6 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 14 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cisco Duo +0.10000000000000142pp · Transmit Security 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cisco Duo leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cisco Duo | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3 per seat / mo | $50,000 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | SaaS |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | FedRAMP High (Duo Federal), FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal), GovRAMP, TX-RAMP, FIPS 140-3 | — |
| Support | Technical documentation, Knowledge base, Community | Enterprise SLA with premium support |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, MI, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Venture Round | Series A · $543M raised |
| Best for | Organizations from small businesses to enterprises and government that want phishing-resistant MFA and simple IAM. | Large enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention |
Plans side by side
Cisco Duo
Transmit Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cisco Duo
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
- Zero Trust device trust and endpoint visibility
- Phishing-resistant MFA, SSO, and device trust
- Free tier for up to 10 users
- Highest PeerSpot rating among access-management products
Transmit Security
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
- Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cisco Duo vs Transmit Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cisco-duo-vs-transmit-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.