Skip to content
SlateIndex
ClearMLThe Infrastructure Platform For AI Builders
vs
Weights & BiasesAI developer platform for building GenAI applications and fine-tuning LLMs
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2

ClearML vs Weights & Biases

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Weights & Biases is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 29.7 versus 20.6 for ClearML, and ranks ahead in 68% of the answers that name both.

Choose ClearML if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • open-source flexibility
  • transparent, clear pricing with a free self-hosted tier
  • end-to-end MLOps coverage in one platform

Choose Weights & Biases if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.7 vs 20.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 43% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Polished, developer-first experiment tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric ClearML Weights & Biases
Visibility score20.6%29.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in MLOps Platforms#8#6
Share of voice4.5%7%
Mentions this run3047
Positive in AI answers43%53%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2ClearML 21%

ClearML 0pp · Weights & Biases 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Weights & Biases leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
22.2%
26.7%
AI Mode
14.3%
37%
Perplexity
25.2%
25.4%
ClearMLWeights & Biases

Head to head in AI answers

25 engine answers name both brands

8ClearML ranked higher
17Weights & Biases ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClearMLWeights & Biases
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceFree; paid from $15 per seat / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentHosted servers, self-hosted, or a managed service in a VPC, on-premises (including air-gapped) or hybrid.Data residency and isolated compute and storage are supported
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, SOC 2 Type II
SupportDedicated Slack channel (Scale), Standard SLA (Scale), White-glove support with custom SLA (Enterprise), Professional services (Enterprise)—
Founded2016—
HeadquartersTel Aviv, Israel—
Employees11–50—
FundingSeries B (reported for parent Allegro AI, unverified, led by New Enterprise Associates) · $16M raised$50M round led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman
Best forIndividuals, researchers and small teams on the free plan, growing AI teams on Pro, and enterprises running GPU clusters for multiple large projects.—

Plans side by side

ClearML

Community$0month
Pro$15user/month + usage
ScaleCustomcustom quote
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
ClearML pricing

Weights & Biases

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

ClearML

  • open-source flexibility
  • transparent, clear pricing with a free self-hosted tier
  • end-to-end MLOps coverage in one platform
  • GPU orchestration and pipeline automation
  • affordable choice for cost-conscious teams

    Weights & Biases

    • Polished, developer-first experiment tracking
    • Strong LLM observability and evaluation
    • Hyperparameter optimization and sweeps
    • Good collaboration features for teams
    • Highly rated by users, about 4.5/5 on G2
    • Pricing is unclear and usage-based charges may apply

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClearML vs Weights & Biases”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clearml-vs-weights-biases, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.