Skip to content
SlateIndex
ClickHouseThe leading database for AI
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

ClickHouse vs Tempo

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Tempo is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 7.1 versus 0.9 for ClickHouse, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose ClickHouse if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (58% vs 6% positive)
  • You need HIPAA or PCI coverage
  • fast real-time analytics
  • high-concurrency analytics performance

Choose Tempo if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.1 vs 0.9)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric ClickHouse Tempo
Visibility score0.9%7.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#31#12
Share of voice0.3%3.1%
Mentions this run218
Positive in AI answers58%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3ClickHouse 1%

ClickHouse 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Tempo leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
8%
AI Mode
1.7%
11.5%
Perplexity
0%
1.9%
ClickHouseTempo

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1ClickHouse ranked higher
1Tempo ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClickHouseTempo
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry price$0.218 / mo—
Free planNo · 30-day trial—
DeploymentClickHouse Cloud on AWS, GCP and Azure, self-managed open-source installs, and Bring Your Own Cloud within the customer's own VPC.Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm
Integrations100+—
ComplianceHIPAA, PCISOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2
SupportExpert support with 1 business day response time on Basic, Expert support with 1 hour response time on Scale, Enterprise support with 30 min response time for Severity 1 issues, Named Lead Support Engineer on Enterprise—
Founded2009—
HeadquartersPalo Alto, CA, United StatesNew York, NY
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries D, led by DragoneerSeries E · $1100M raised
Best forDevelopers and data teams that need real-time queries on large datasets at an affordable cost, including teams adding a speed layer on top of an existing data warehouse or OLTP database.—

Plans side by side

ClickHouse

Basic$0.218per compute unit / hr
Scale$0.299per compute unit / hr
Enterprise$0.39per compute unit / hr
ClickHouse pricing

Tempo

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

ClickHouse

  • fast real-time analytics
  • high-concurrency analytics performance
  • strong for observability and log analytics
  • $300 credits and 30-day trial
  • best raw performance-to-cost ratio
  • self-hosting requires scaling and maintenance work
  • efficient operation at very large scale needs specialized expertise
  • specialist option rather than broad enterprise warehouse replacement

Tempo

  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
  • Distributed tracing for traces
  • Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
  • Managed option with a permanent free tier
  • Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClickHouse vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clickhouse-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.