CloudBeesThe governed software delivery solution for the agentic era
vs
GitHubThe home of software development
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
CloudBees vs GitHub
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 83.3 versus 2.8 for CloudBees, and ranks ahead in 83% of the answers that name both.
Choose CloudBees if…
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
- Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (83.3 vs 2.8)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CloudBees | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 83.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #20 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 12.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 72 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CloudBees 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloudBeesGitHub
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
1CloudBees ranked higher
5GitHub ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | CloudBees | GitHub |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CI/CD vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #6 | #3 |
| Which CI/CD vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #4 | #7 |
| Which CI/CD vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #5 | #1 |
| Official website of the top CI/CD tool vendors | ChatGPT | #13 | #1 |
| Official website of the top CI/CD tool vendors | AI Mode | #9 | #1 |
| Who makes the most used CI/CD tool? | AI Mode | #5 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CloudBees | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Hybrid and multi-cloud environments | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO |
| Support | Support team | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2010 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, CA, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series F, with Goldman Sachs Asset Management private credit clients leading | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises that need to govern CI/CD and agentic coding across mixed toolchains | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. |
Plans side by side
CloudBees
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CloudBees
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
- Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
- Jenkins has been edged out in new adoptions by native CI/CD tools
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CloudBees vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cloudbees-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.