Skip to content
SlateIndex
CodeGeeXAI Coding Assistants
vs
ContinuePioneering open-source coding agent
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

CodeGeeX vs Continue

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Continue is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 1.7 versus 0 for CodeGeeX.

Choose CodeGeeX if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose Continue if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.7 vs 0)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric CodeGeeX Continue
Visibility score0%1.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#39#22
Share of voice0%0.8%
Mentions this run04
Positive in AI answers—33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3CodeGeeX 0%

CodeGeeX 0pp · Continue 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Continue leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
3%
AI Mode
0%
1.3%
Perplexity
0%
0.9%
CodeGeeXContinue

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0CodeGeeX ranked higher
0Continue ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCodeGeeXContinue
DeploymentCloud-hosted service; the enterprise tier offers local or cloud private deployment.Open-source editor extensions and CLI, with self-hosted and local model use supported
Founded20222023
HeadquartersChinaSan Francisco, CA, USA
Employees—11–50
Funding—Seed (SAFEs), led by Heavybit · $5M raised
Best forIndividual developers who want a free coding assistant.—

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “CodeGeeX vs Continue”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codegeex-vs-continue, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.