CodemagicOne tool for all your mobile app builds.
vs
GitHubThe home of software development
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Codemagic vs GitHub
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 83.3 versus 0.9 for Codemagic, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codemagic if…
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (83.3 vs 0.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($4 vs $3,990)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codemagic | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 83.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #28 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 12.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 72 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codemagic 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodemagicGitHub
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Codemagic ranked higher
0GitHub ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Codemagic | GitHub |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CI/CD tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #3 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codemagic | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3,990 / mo | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted and fully maintained; dedicated servers optional, hosted in your region | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO |
| Support | Community support, Technical support, Priority support (enterprise), Free onboarding assistance | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised |
| Best for | Teams building Flutter, React Native, native Android and iOS apps who want hosted mobile CI/CD. | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codemagic
Profile in progress.
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codemagic vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codemagic-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.