ContinuePioneering open-source coding agent
vs
JulesAsynchronous coding agent that works on GitHub repositories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Continue vs Jules
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Continue is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 1.7 versus 0 for Jules.
Choose Continue if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.7 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Jules if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Continue | Jules |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.7% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #22 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Continue 0pp · Jules 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Continue leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ContinueJules
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Continue ranked higher
0Jules ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Continue | Jules |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Open-source editor extensions and CLI, with self-hosted and local model use supported | Cloud-hosted: each task runs in a secure Google Cloud virtual machine |
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, USA | Mountain View, California |
| Employees | 11–50 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Seed (SAFEs), led by Heavybit · $5M raised | — |
| Best for | — | Developers on GitHub who want routine tasks such as bug fixes, tests and version bumps handled asynchronously |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Continue vs Jules”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/continue-vs-jules, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.