Skip to content
SlateIndex
ContinuePioneering open-source coding agent
vs
Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Continue vs Kilo Code

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 1.7 for Continue, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Continue if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose Kilo Code if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 1.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 33% positive)
  • Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
  • Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Continue Kilo Code
Visibility score1.7%5.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#22#17
Share of voice0.8%1.1%
Mentions this run46
Positive in AI answers33%100%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Continue 2%

Continue 0pp · Kilo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Kilo Code leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3%
3.7%
AI Mode
1.3%
0%
Perplexity
0.9%
12.2%
ContinueKilo Code

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Continue ranked higher
1Kilo Code ranked higher
PromptEngineContinueKilo Code
Is there a free AI coding assistant for small teams? ChatGPT#5#1

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionContinueKilo Code
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentOpen-source editor extensions and CLI, with self-hosted and local model use supportedIDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted
Support—Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan
Founded2023—
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, USA—
Employees11–50—
FundingSeed (SAFEs), led by Heavybit · $5M raisedSeed · $8M raised
Best for—Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud.

Plans side by side

Continue

Pricing not available.

Kilo Code

Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Kilo Code pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Continue

Profile in progress.

Kilo Code

  • Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
  • Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Continue vs Kilo Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/continue-vs-kilo-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.