Countly vs Kubit

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Countly is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 2.2 versus 0.3 for Kubit.

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.2 vs 0.3)
You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or TISAX Participant coverage
You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Countly +0.40000000000000013pp · Kubit +0.3pp over 1 weekly runs.

Countly leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

0.9%

AI Mode

Perplexity

5.6%

CountlyKubit

0 engine answers name both brands

0Countly ranked higher

0Kubit ranked higher

Dimension	Countly	Kubit
Pricing model	Usage-based	—
Entry price	$175 / mo	—
Free plan	No · 14-day trial	—
Deployment	On-premise, self-hosted, or managed private cloud	Runs inside the customer's own data warehouse, with no SDK or pipeline to install.
Compliance	ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type II, TISAX Participant	—
Support	Dedicated Customer Success Manager (Enterprise), Tailored onboarding and support (Enterprise), Service level agreement (Enterprise)	Email support@kubit.ai, /kubit:support command in Claude Code
Founded	2013	2018
Headquarters	London, United Kingdom	Los Altos, California, US
Employees	51–200	11–50
Funding	Seed (led by Seedcamp, with Notion Capital and angels)	Series A, led by Insight Partners with Shasta Ventures and TSVC · $24M raised
Best for	Organizations that want product analytics with full data ownership, from growing teams that want a managed private cloud to regulated or security-conscious organizations that need self-hosting.	Teams running AI agents that want to find failure patterns in traces already stored in their data warehouse.