CrateDBEuropean real-time analytics database for live operational data
vs
FaissA library for efficient similarity search and clustering of dense vectors.
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
CrateDB vs Faiss
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Faiss is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 5.4 versus 0 for CrateDB.
Choose CrateDB if…
- You need ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure) or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
Choose Faiss if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.4 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (12% vs 0% positive)
- No separate server needed for small or static datasets
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | CrateDB | Faiss |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 5.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #29 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 12% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrateDB 0pp · Faiss 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Faiss leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrateDBFaiss
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrateDB ranked higher
0Faiss ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrateDB | Faiss |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.073 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | On-prem, at the edge, in public or private cloud, or fully managed on CrateDB Cloud or STACKIT. | Self-hosted library that runs inside the calling process on a local machine. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure), SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Development support (free plan), Basic support (included with dedicated plans), Premium support (optional) | — |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Vienna, Austria | — |
| Employees | 11–50 | — |
| Funding | Seed round (per Caplight, amount not stated) | — |
| Best for | Teams with high-volume, high-cardinality operational data, such as sensor, telemetry and event streams, who need real-time analytics, search and vector queries without ETL. | Developers who need fast vector search inside their own application and can handle low-level setup. |
Plans side by side
CrateDB
Shared$0.073hour (starting)
Dedicated$0.246hour (starting, incl. basic support)
CustomCustomcontact us
Faiss
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrateDB
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
- Weaker than full transactional guarantees
Faiss
- No separate server needed for small or static datasets
- Barebones in-memory library rather than a full-featured database
- Lacks metadata storage and filtering for hybrid queries
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrateDB vs Faiss”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cratedb-vs-faiss, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.