CrateDBEuropean real-time analytics database for live operational data
vs
PineconeBuild knowledgeable AI
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
CrateDB vs Pinecone
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pinecone is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 71.8 versus 0 for CrateDB.
Choose CrateDB if…
- You want a lower entry price ($0.073 vs $20)
- You need ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure) coverage
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
Choose Pinecone if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (71.8 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 0% positive)
- You need HIPAA or GDPR or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | CrateDB | Pinecone |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 71.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #29 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 14% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 66 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrateDB 0pp · Pinecone 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pinecone leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrateDBPinecone
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrateDB ranked higher
0Pinecone ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrateDB | Pinecone |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.073 / mo | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | On-prem, at the edge, in public or private cloud, or fully managed on CrateDB Cloud or STACKIT. | Fully managed cloud service, with an optional bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployment |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure), SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Development support (free plan), Basic support (included with dedicated plans), Premium support (optional) | Community support via Discord on Starter, Free support with response SLAs available via Developer or Pro add-on, Pro support included on Enterprise and BYOC, Dedicated customer success and support SLAs on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Vienna, Austria | New York, NY |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed round (per Caplight, amount not stated) | Series B · $138M raised |
| Best for | Teams with high-volume, high-cardinality operational data, such as sensor, telemetry and event streams, who need real-time analytics, search and vector queries without ETL. | Production AI applications, from solo developers and small teams to mission-critical enterprise deployments |
Plans side by side
CrateDB
Shared$0.073hour (starting)
Dedicated$0.246hour (starting, incl. basic support)
CustomCustomcontact us
Pinecone
Starter$0free
Builder$20month flat
Standard$50month minimum usage
Enterprise$500month minimum usage
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrateDB
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
- Weaker than full transactional guarantees
Pinecone
- Zero-ops, fully managed cloud service
- Easiest managed option to start with
- Enterprise-grade reliability and scalability
- Free tier and trial credits for testing
- Most-used and widely adopted vector database
- Monthly minimum charges on paid tiers
- Free tier limits the number of vectors
- Concern about vendor lock-in
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrateDB vs Pinecone”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cratedb-vs-pinecone, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.