CrateDBEuropean real-time analytics database for live operational data
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
CrateDB vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 0 for CrateDB.
Choose CrateDB if…
- You want a lower entry price ($0.073 vs $25)
- You need ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure) or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (18% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | CrateDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #29 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrateDB 0pp · Supabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrateDBSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrateDB ranked higher
0Supabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrateDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.073 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | On-prem, at the edge, in public or private cloud, or fully managed on CrateDB Cloud or STACKIT. | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure), SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Development support (free plan), Basic support (included with dedicated plans), Premium support (optional) | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Vienna, Austria | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed round (per Caplight, amount not stated) | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Teams with high-volume, high-cardinality operational data, such as sensor, telemetry and event streams, who need real-time analytics, search and vector queries without ETL. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
CrateDB
Shared$0.073hour (starting)
Dedicated$0.246hour (starting, incl. basic support)
CustomCustomcontact us
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrateDB
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
- Weaker than full transactional guarantees
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrateDB vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cratedb-vs-supabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.