CrateDBEuropean real-time analytics database for live operational data
vs
TiDBThe distributed SQL database built for AI agents
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
CrateDB vs TiDB
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
TiDB is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0 for CrateDB.
Choose CrateDB if…
- You want a lower entry price ($0.073 vs $400)
- You need ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure) or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
Choose TiDB if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2013 or SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | CrateDB | TiDB |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #29 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrateDB 0pp · TiDB 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
TiDB leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrateDBTiDB
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrateDB ranked higher
0TiDB ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrateDB | TiDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.073 / mo | Free; paid from $400 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | On-prem, at the edge, in public or private cloud, or fully managed on CrateDB Cloud or STACKIT. | Managed cloud service (TiDB Cloud), bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployment in the customer's cloud account, and self-managed open source |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure), SOC 2 Type II | ISO/IEC 27001:2013, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Development support (free plan), Basic support (included with dedicated plans), Premium support (optional) | Online documentation and setup guides, FAQs, Contact sales |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Vienna, Austria | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed round (per Caplight, amount not stated) | Series A |
| Best for | Teams with high-volume, high-cardinality operational data, such as sensor, telemetry and event streams, who need real-time analytics, search and vector queries without ETL. | Teams building AI agents and agentic workloads that need vectors, transactions and analytics in one database |
Plans side by side
CrateDB
Shared$0.073hour (starting)
Dedicated$0.246hour (starting, incl. basic support)
CustomCustomcontact us
TiDB
Starter$0month
Essential (Public Preview)$400month (compute from)
Premium (Public Preview)$1,800month (compute from)
Dedicated$1,376month (cluster from)
BYOC (Public Preview)Custom
TiDB Cloud Lake Personal (Public Preview)$1.6hour (warehouse compute from)
TiDB Cloud Lake Business (Public Preview)$2.4hour (warehouse compute from)
TiDB Cloud Lake Dedicated (Public Preview)Custom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrateDB
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
- Weaker than full transactional guarantees
TiDB
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrateDB vs TiDB”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cratedb-vs-tidb, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.