CrewAI vs Microsoft AutoGen
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CrewAI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17.5 versus 4.5 for Microsoft AutoGen, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose CrewAI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.5 vs 4.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
Choose Microsoft AutoGen if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CrewAI | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.5% | 4.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #7 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 4.9% | 1.2% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrewAI 0pp · Microsoft AutoGen 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CrewAI leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | CrewAI | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is the difference between an AI agent platform and MLOps Platforms? | AI Mode | #1 | #3 |
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #2 | #3 |
| Best AI agent platform for enterprise | AI Mode | #6 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | AI Mode | #3 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | AI Mode | #2 | #3 |
| Best AI agent platform with AI features | AI Mode | #2 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrewAI | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | CrewAI cloud, customer VPC on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, or fully on-premises (AMP Factory). | Open-source Python library |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Community forum, Dedicated support with Slack/Teams channel, Support contact, On-site support | — |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Redmond, Washington (parent: Microsoft) |
| Employees | 11–50 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B | — |
| Best for | Enabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them. | — |
Plans side by side
Microsoft AutoGen
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrewAI
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
- Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
- Free open-source Python framework
- Good for quickly prototyping multi-agent systems
- Industry standard for pro-code multi-agent orchestration
- Better suited to developers than nontechnical users
Microsoft AutoGen
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrewAI vs Microsoft AutoGen”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crewai-vs-microsoft-autogen, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.