CrewAIThe Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on
vs
OneReach.aiAgentic Orchestration Platform for the Enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
CrewAI vs OneReach.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CrewAI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17.5 versus 1 for OneReach.ai.
Choose CrewAI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.5 vs 1)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
- Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
Choose OneReach.ai if…
- You need UK Cyber Essentials or HITRUST coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CrewAI | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.5% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #7 | #58 |
| Share of voice | 4.9% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrewAI 0pp · OneReach.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CrewAI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrewAIOneReach.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrewAI ranked higher
0OneReach.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrewAI | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | CrewAI cloud, customer VPC on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, or fully on-premises (AMP Factory). | Dedicated Private Environment hosted in the customer's cloud or managed by OneReach, on public, private, government or sovereign infrastructure. |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials, HITRUST |
| Support | Community forum, Dedicated support with Slack/Teams channel, Support contact, On-site support | 24/7 support is standard across managed, infrastructure-only and combined service models |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Denver, CO |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B | Private equity round led by LoneTree Capital (listed as Growth Equity by Caplight) |
| Best for | Enabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them. | Large enterprises, especially in regulated industries such as government, finance and healthcare, that need many AI agents governed, costed and reused under central IT control. |
Plans side by side
OneReach.ai
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrewAI
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
- Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
- Free open-source Python framework
- Good for quickly prototyping multi-agent systems
- Industry standard for pro-code multi-agent orchestration
- Better suited to developers than nontechnical users
OneReach.ai
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrewAI vs OneReach.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crewai-vs-onereach-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.