CrewAIThe Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on
vs
SimThe open-source AI workspace to build, distribute, and govern AI agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
CrewAI vs Sim
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CrewAI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17.5 versus 2.3 for Sim, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose CrewAI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.5 vs 2.3)
- You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 275+)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
Choose Sim if…
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Technical control and model flexibility
- Self-hosting option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CrewAI | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.5% | 2.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #7 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 4.9% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrewAI 0pp · Sim 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CrewAI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrewAISim
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
3CrewAI ranked higher
0Sim ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | CrewAI | Sim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top AI agent platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #7 | #17 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #23 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | ChatGPT | #8 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrewAI | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $25 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | CrewAI cloud, customer VPC on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, or fully on-premises (AMP Factory). | Cloud-hosted, or self-hosted in your own cloud with Docker or Kubernetes |
| Integrations | 1000+ | 275+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Community forum, Dedicated support with Slack/Teams channel, Support contact, On-site support | Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B | Series A · $7M raised |
| Best for | Enabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them. | Companies that need to build, deploy, and govern AI agents across the organization with central control over access, spend, and data |
Plans side by side
Sim
Free$0free forever
Pro$25per user/month, billed monthly
Max$100per user/month, billed monthly
EnterpriseCustomcustom, talk to sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrewAI
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
- Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
- Free open-source Python framework
- Good for quickly prototyping multi-agent systems
- Industry standard for pro-code multi-agent orchestration
- Better suited to developers than nontechnical users
Sim
- Technical control and model flexibility
- Self-hosting option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrewAI vs Sim”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crewai-vs-sim, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.