DeepSourceYour green light to ship with confidence.
vs
KiroSpec-driven agentic development environment from AWS
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
DeepSource vs Kiro
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kiro is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for DeepSource.
Choose DeepSource if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
Choose Kiro if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($20 vs $24)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (covered under AWS certification) coverage
- Publishes clear numerical credit or request allowances
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | DeepSource | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #40 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 22% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DeepSource 0pp · Kiro 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kiro leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DeepSourceKiro
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0DeepSource ranked higher
0Kiro ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DeepSource | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $24 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud; self-hosted deployment available on the Enterprise plan | Desktop IDE, command-line CLI, web browser and cloud sessions |
| Integrations | — | 500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (covered under AWS certification) |
| Support | Priority support on the Team plan, Priority support with SLA on the Enterprise plan, Dedicated account manager on the Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2018 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | — | Seattle, Washington |
| Funding | Pre-seed | — |
| Best for | Engineering teams, from startups to Fortune 500s, that want code review on pull requests covering security and code quality. | Developers and teams who want spec-driven development with AI agents, including enterprises that need IAM, SSO and governance controls |
Plans side by side
DeepSource
Open SourceCustom
Team$24user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Kiro
Free$0month
Pro$20user / month
Pro+$40user / month
Pro Max$100user / month
Power$200user / month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DeepSource
Profile in progress.
Kiro
- Publishes clear numerical credit or request allowances
- Suited to AWS-heavy enterprises needing cloud-platform integration
- Recommended as the successor to Amazon Q Developer IDE plugins
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DeepSource vs Kiro”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/deepsource-vs-kiro, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.