DeepSourceYour green light to ship with confidence.
vs
QodoAI code review and governance for teams shipping AI-written code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
DeepSource vs Qodo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qodo is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 0 for DeepSource.
Choose DeepSource if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Qodo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 0)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Strong free tooling for code review, test generation, and bug detection inside the IDE
- Exceptional context-aware autocomplete and unit test generation on the free tier
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | DeepSource | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 9.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #40 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 3.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 46% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DeepSource 0pp · Qodo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qodo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DeepSourceQodo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0DeepSource ranked higher
0Qodo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DeepSource | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $24 per seat / mo | $30 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud; self-hosted deployment available on the Enterprise plan | Single-tenant SaaS or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Priority support on the Team plan, Priority support with SLA on the Enterprise plan, Dedicated account manager on the Enterprise plan | Standard support: documentation, in-product help and ticket-based response, Priority support, dedicated SLA and assigned team member on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2018 | — |
| Headquarters | — | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Pre-seed | Series B · $120M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams, from startups to Fortune 500s, that want code review on pull requests covering security and code quality. | Engineering teams shipping code at the speed AI writes it and needing consistent review and governance |
Plans side by side
DeepSource
Open SourceCustom
Team$24user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DeepSource
Profile in progress.
Qodo
- Strong free tooling for code review, test generation, and bug detection inside the IDE
- Exceptional context-aware autocomplete and unit test generation on the free tier
- Automated test generation and pull request review that helps prevent breaking changes
- Offers a free trial, reportedly without a credit card
- Strong choice for review and testing controls in privacy and governance needs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DeepSource vs Qodo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/deepsource-vs-qodo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.