EpicorWe're the essential partner to the world's most essential businesses.
vs
FloQastLess manual work. More control.
Comparison · Accounting Software · weekly run Nov 2
Epicor vs FloQast
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FloQast is the stronger AI pick in Accounting Software: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0 for Epicor.
Choose Epicor if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong fit for mid-market manufacturing, distribution, and industrial businesses
Choose FloQast if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.3 vs 0)
- You need ISO 42001 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Epicor | FloQast |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Accounting Software | #40 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Epicor 0pp · FloQast 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FloQast leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
EpicorFloQast
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Epicor ranked higher
0FloQast ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Epicor | FloQast |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Cloud and on-premises; Kinetic and Prophet 21 get a final on-premises feature release in 2028.1 | Cloud-native platform |
| Compliance | — | ISO 42001, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, SOC 1 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 |
| Support | Epicor Customer Success Hub, EpicCare support tools, Epicor Learning training | — |
| Founded | 1972 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Austin, TX, United States | Sherman Oaks, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series D | Series E · $282M raised |
| Best for | Manufacturing, distribution, retail and services businesses that need industry-specific ERP | Enterprise accounting teams that need an audit-ready close, reconciliations and controls. |
Plans side by side
Epicor
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Epicor
- Strong fit for mid-market manufacturing, distribution, and industrial businesses
- Recommended for manufacturing-focused businesses
- Recognised by analysts as a leading ERP vendor
- Good ERP choice for small and midsize companies
FloQast
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Epicor vs FloQast”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/epicor-vs-floqast, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.