FloatThe #1 rated resource management software
vs
GitHubThe home of software development
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Float vs GitHub
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 0 for Float.
Choose Float if…
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR or B Corp certification coverage
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Float | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 10.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #48 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Float 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FloatGitHub
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Float ranked higher
0GitHub ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Float | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $7 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, B Corp certification | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO |
| Support | 24/7 AI chat with Mon–Fri human support, Designated customer success contact on Enterprise, Priority support and custom SLAs on Enterprise | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Remote | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised |
| Best for | Agencies, professional services firms and in-house delivery teams that need to see who is doing what, at what cost, across every project. | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Float
Starter$7per scheduled person/month
Pro$12per scheduled person/month
EnterpriseCustomannual contract only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Float
Profile in progress.
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Float vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/float-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.