Skip to content
SlateIndex
Fly.ioLaunch computers for agents, code sandboxes, and your next app.
vs
Google Cloud BuildServerless build and CI/CD service on Google Cloud
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

Fly.io vs Google Cloud Build

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Google Cloud Build is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 3.7 versus 0 for Fly.io.

Choose Fly.io if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package) coverage

Choose Google Cloud Build if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.7 vs 0)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 3 coverage
  • practical choice for deployments centred on Google Cloud

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Fly.io Google Cloud Build
Visibility score0%3.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#38#18
Share of voice0%1.8%
Mentions this run011
Positive in AI answers—0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Fly.io 0%

Fly.io 0pp · Google Cloud Build 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Google Cloud Build leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
7%
AI Mode
0%
1.3%
Perplexity
0%
2.8%
Fly.ioGoogle Cloud Build

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Fly.io ranked higher
0Google Cloud Build ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFly.ioGoogle Cloud Build
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $38 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentOperated by Fly.io on its own hardware across 18+ regions worldwide, deployed from GitHub or the fly CLI.Fully serverless on Google Cloud, with no infrastructure to set up, upgrade, or scale. Builds can run in a fully managed environment with connectivity to the buyer's private network, and data at rest can be kept in a chosen region.
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package)ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 3
SupportCommunity support (free), Paid Standard, Premium and Enterprise support tiers, Dedicated Slack channel on Premium and Enterprise—
Founded2017—
HeadquartersChicago, Illinois, United States—
Employees51–200—
FundingSeed · $136M raised—
Best forDevelopers and teams that want to ship apps, AI agents and code sandboxes without managing infrastructure.—

Plans side by side

Fly.io

Basic$38month
Starter$72month
Launch$282month
Scale$962month
Performance$1,922month
Fly.io pricing

Google Cloud Build

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Fly.io

Profile in progress.

Google Cloud Build

  • practical choice for deployments centred on Google Cloud
  • integration and configuration less convenient for teams not on Google Cloud

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fly.io vs Google Cloud Build”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fly-io-vs-google-cloud-build, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.