GetAcceptRun every deal like your best sales rep
vs
LinkSquaresThe agentic CLM software trusted by contract teams to draft, review, and manage contracts faster with AI.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
GetAccept vs LinkSquares
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GetAccept is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15.7 versus 1.4 for LinkSquares.
Choose GetAccept if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.7 vs 1.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or eIDAS (AdES, QES) coverage
- All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
Choose LinkSquares if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Powerful AI-driven contract analytics
- Useful post-signature insights
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GetAccept | LinkSquares |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.7% | 1.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #8 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 4.8% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 26 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GetAccept 0pp · LinkSquares 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GetAccept leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GetAcceptLinkSquares
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GetAccept ranked higher
0LinkSquares ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GetAccept | LinkSquares |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $25 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS | Multi-tenant or single-tenant cloud SaaS hosted on U.S.-based AWS infrastructure |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA, eIDAS (AdES, QES) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Help center and chat support (06:00–00:00 UTC), Dedicated customer success manager (add-on) | — |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | Boston, MA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B, led by Bessemer Venture Partners | Announced funding round (undated) · $160M raised |
| Best for | B2B sales teams: smaller teams that need e-signature, and larger teams scaling complex sales processes on the AI-native plan | Legal, procurement, finance and sales teams that need every agreement in one governed system |
Plans side by side
GetAccept
eSign$25per user/month
Professional$49per user/month, minimum 5 users
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
LinkSquares
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GetAccept
- All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
- Strong interactive deal rooms and sales-room features
- Good fit for heavier sales-enablement needs
- Suited to multi-stakeholder B2B SaaS deals
- Strong buyer engagement and analytics for CRM-centred sales
LinkSquares
- Powerful AI-driven contract analytics
- Useful post-signature insights
- Suited to fast-growing companies and in-house counsel
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GetAccept vs LinkSquares”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/getaccept-vs-linksquares, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.