GitHubThe home of software development
vs
HopsworksThe AI Lakehouse for Real-Time ML
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
GitHub vs Hopsworks
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 9 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GitHub | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #11 | #52 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 0.1% |
| Mentions this run | 14 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · Hopsworks 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitHubHopsworks
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1GitHub ranked higher
0Hopsworks ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | GitHub | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should an MLOps platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #4 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Hopsworks
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs Hopsworks”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-hopsworks, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.