GitHub vs OpenProject
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 0 for OpenProject.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose OpenProject if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub | OpenProject |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.2% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #10 | #53 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · OpenProject 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | OpenProject |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | On-premises or hosted by OpenProject in the EU or Germany |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | — |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | Community forum and tickets, Email support (Basic and above), Phone support (Professional and above), Dedicated support engineer (Corporate) |
| Founded | 2008 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | Accelerator/incubator investment (TechCode, minority stake) |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Organizations that want open source project management with control over their data, including universities, public sector bodies, NGOs and companies focused on data sovereignty. |
Plans side by side
OpenProject
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
OpenProject
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs OpenProject”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-openproject, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.