GitHubThe home of software development
vs
Platform.shThe software factory for AI-human workflows
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
GitHub vs Platform.sh
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 83.3 versus 0 for Platform.sh.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (83.3 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Platform.sh if…
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or FS Cloud coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub | Platform.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 83.3% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #1 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 12.3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 72 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · Platform.sh 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitHubPlatform.sh
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GitHub ranked higher
0Platform.sh ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | Platform.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | Multi-cloud, across five clouds and 14 regions |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, FS Cloud |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | Standard support: 4-hour best effort urgent-ticket response, included by default, Advanced support: 1-hour guaranteed urgent-ticket response, Premium support: 30-minute guaranteed urgent-ticket response |
| Founded | 2008 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Paris, France |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | Series D · $180M raised |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Developers, DevOps engineers and platform teams that want to move faster with AI-assisted work while keeping human approval and cost control. |
Plans side by side
Platform.sh
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Platform.sh
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs Platform.sh”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-platform-sh, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.