Skip to content
SlateIndex
GleanEnterprise AI that understands your company
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Glean vs OutSystems

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0.9 for Glean.

Choose Glean if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 42% positive)
  • You need ISO 42001 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • Enterprise search across many connected apps
  • Seen as a market leader in enterprise search

Choose OutSystems if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0.9)
  • You need more native integrations (400+ vs 250+)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Glean OutSystems
Visibility score0.9%2.8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#63#32
Share of voice0.4%0.8%
Mentions this run35
Positive in AI answers56%42%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Glean 1%

Glean 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

OutSystems leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.8%
0%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
8.5%
GleanOutSystems

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Glean ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGleanOutSystems
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentPer-customer search model stored in the customer's VPCCloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans
Integrations250+400+
ComplianceISO 42001, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPRSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE)
SupportHelp Center—
Founded20192001
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CABoston, Massachusetts, United States
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeed or early-stage round (emerged from stealth) · $765M raisedSeries F, led by KKR
Best forLarge enterprises that want AI answers and agents grounded in their own permission-aware company dataRegulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust

Plans side by side

Glean

Pricing not available.

OutSystems

OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
OutSystems pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Glean

  • Enterprise search across many connected apps
  • Seen as a market leader in enterprise search
  • Finds answers and internal experts quickly
  • Recommended for enterprise-wide knowledge search

    OutSystems

    • Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
    • High performance and speed in app delivery
    • Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
    • Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
    • Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
    • Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
    • High cost for enterprise tiers

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glean vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glean-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.