Skip to content
SlateIndex
GoodTimeSmarter Interview Scheduling, Better Experiences
vs
OpenCATSFree, open-source applicant tracking that stays in your hands
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

GoodTime vs OpenCATS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

OpenCATS is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 0.6 versus 0 for GoodTime.

Choose GoodTime if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000) or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 42001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage

Choose OpenCATS if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.6 vs 0)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric GoodTime OpenCATS
Visibility score0%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#76#61
Share of voice0%0.2%
Mentions this run01
Positive in AI answers—0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3GoodTime 0%

GoodTime 0pp · OpenCATS 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

OpenCATS leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
1.7%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
0%
GoodTimeOpenCATS

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0GoodTime ranked higher
0OpenCATS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGoodTimeOpenCATS
Deployment—Self-hosted
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000), SOC 3, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR, CCPA—
SupportCustomer Help CenterCommunity forum, Subreddit for peer-to-peer user support, Public installation documentation
Founded2016—
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, US—
Employees51–200—
FundingSeed (seed/angel)—
Best forEnterprise talent teams that run complex panel, multi-day and high-volume interview scheduling.Staffing agencies, internal recruiting teams and hiring workflows that want self-hosted control of their recruiting data

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoodTime vs OpenCATS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/goodtime-vs-opencats, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.