Google Cloud DeployManaged continuous delivery for GKE and Cloud Run.
vs
HerokuThe AI cloud application platform, from Salesforce, for deploying, managing, and scaling your apps.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Google Cloud Deploy vs Heroku
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Heroku is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0 for Google Cloud Deploy.
Choose Google Cloud Deploy if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27701 or HDS v2.0 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Heroku if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.3 vs 0)
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider or HIPAA or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Google Cloud Deploy | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #40 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Google Cloud Deploy 0pp · Heroku 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Heroku leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Google Cloud DeployHeroku
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Google Cloud Deploy ranked higher
0Heroku ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Google Cloud Deploy | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $5 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Managed Google Cloud service; not self-hosted. | Fully managed cloud platform as a service (container-based) |
| Integrations | — | 150+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, HDS v2.0 | PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | — | Enterprise-grade support with SLAs and onboarding for Heroku Enterprise customers |
| Founded | — | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California | San Francisco, California, United States (Salesforce headquarters, 415 Mission St) |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series A dated March 13, 2013 (amount redacted, not confirmed) |
| Best for | Google Cloud deployment teams needing promotion, canary rollouts, approvals, rollback, and audit trails. | Developers, startups, agencies and enterprises that want to deploy and scale apps without managing servers |
Plans side by side
Google Cloud Deploy
Pricing not available.
Heroku
Eco$5per dyno per month
Basic$7per dyno per month
Standard-1X$25per dyno per month
Standard-2X$50per dyno per month
Performance-M$250per dyno per month
Performance-L$500per dyno per month
Performance-L-RAM$500per dyno per month
Performance-XL$750per dyno per month
Performance-2XL$1,500per dyno per month
Private-S$125per dyno per month
Private-M$250per dyno per month
Shield-S$150per dyno per month
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Google Cloud Deploy vs Heroku”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/google-cloud-deploy-vs-heroku, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.