HerokuThe AI cloud application platform, from Salesforce, for deploying, managing, and scaling your apps.
vs
Travis CISimple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Heroku vs Travis CI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Travis CI is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 0.3 for Heroku.
Choose Heroku if…
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $15)
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider or HIPAA or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Travis CI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR or Privacy Shield coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Heroku | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #31 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Heroku 0pp · Travis CI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Travis CI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HerokuTravis CI
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Heroku ranked higher
0Travis CI ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Heroku | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $5 / mo | $15 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Fully managed cloud platform as a service (container-based) | Hosted SaaS, with an on-premise or private cloud option (Travis CI Server) |
| Integrations | 150+ | — |
| Compliance | PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3 | GDPR, Privacy Shield |
| Support | Enterprise-grade support with SLAs and onboarding for Heroku Enterprise customers | Ask Travis AI, Ticket-based support, Premium support |
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States (Salesforce headquarters, 415 Mission St) | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series A dated March 13, 2013 (amount redacted, not confirmed) | — |
| Best for | Developers, startups, agencies and enterprises that want to deploy and scale apps without managing servers | Developers and small-to-midsize teams that want a minimal CI/CD configuration |
Plans side by side
Heroku
Eco$5per dyno per month
Basic$7per dyno per month
Standard-1X$25per dyno per month
Standard-2X$50per dyno per month
Performance-M$250per dyno per month
Performance-L$500per dyno per month
Performance-L-RAM$500per dyno per month
Performance-XL$750per dyno per month
Performance-2XL$1,500per dyno per month
Private-S$125per dyno per month
Private-M$250per dyno per month
Shield-S$150per dyno per month
Travis CI
Usage Based$15per month (monthly billing)
Unlimited Plan$78per month, starting price (monthly billing)
Server$34per month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Heroku
Profile in progress.
Travis CI
- Free testing for open-source projects
- Hosted build and test service for GitHub projects
- Among the clearest CI options found
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heroku vs Travis CI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heroku-vs-travis-ci, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.