Infor BirstCloud business intelligence and analytics from Infor
vs
MetabaseOpen source AI analytics you can verify
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2
Infor Birst vs Metabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Metabase is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 21.7 versus 0 for Infor Birst.
Choose Infor Birst if…
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Metabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.7 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Free open-source edition for self-hosting
- Easy to deploy and user-friendly
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Infor Birst | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 21.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #45 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 5.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 63% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Infor Birst 0pp · Metabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Metabase leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Infor BirstMetabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Infor Birst ranked higher
0Metabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Infor Birst | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Multi-tenant cloud or in-house appliance | Self-hosted or Metabase Cloud, with air-gapped deployment available on Enterprise |
| Integrations | — | 237+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2 | SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | — | Email, Support form, Slack, Microsoft Teams |
| Founded | — | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, Georgia, USA | — |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series F | Series B · $43M raised |
| Best for | — | Teams that want self-service analytics without relying on engineers, and software companies that need to embed analytics in their product |
Plans side by side
Infor Birst
Pricing not available.
Metabase
Open Source$0free, self-hosted, unlimited users
Starter$100month (5 users included, +$6/user/month)
Pro$575month (10 users included, +$12/user/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing (starts at $20,000 / year)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Infor Birst
Profile in progress.
Metabase
- Free open-source edition for self-hosting
- Easy to deploy and user-friendly
- No-code visual builder and SQL for non-technical users
- Affordable, low-cost BI
- Best default starting point for startups and small teams
- Self-hosting means handling hosting, security, backups and updates yourself
- Extra token-based AI or custom usage fees on top of plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Infor Birst vs Metabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/infor-birst-vs-metabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.