JetBrains AI Assistant vs Kilo Code
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
JetBrains AI Assistant is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 6.2 versus 5.3 for Kilo Code.
Choose JetBrains AI Assistant if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.2 vs 5.3)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- natural choice for teams standardized on JetBrains IDEs
- listed among the strongest AI coding platforms
Choose Kilo Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | JetBrains AI Assistant | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.2% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #15 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 2.2% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JetBrains AI Assistant 0pp · Kilo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
JetBrains AI Assistant leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JetBrains AI Assistant | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Plugin inside JetBrains IDEs; works only within JetBrains IDEs | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | — |
| Support | Contact support form, Enterprise-grade support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2000 | — |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Incubator/accelerator round (Leading European Tech Scaleups) | Seed · $8M raised |
| Best for | Development teams and businesses that want AI coding help inside JetBrains IDEs | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. |
Plans side by side
JetBrains AI Assistant
Pricing not available.
Kilo Code
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JetBrains AI Assistant
- natural choice for teams standardized on JetBrains IDEs
- listed among the strongest AI coding platforms
- limited trial available to eligible users
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JetBrains AI Assistant vs Kilo Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jetbrains-ai-assistant-vs-kilo-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.