JetBrains AI Assistant vs Kiro
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
JetBrains AI Assistant is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 6.2 versus 2.8 for Kiro, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose JetBrains AI Assistant if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.2 vs 2.8)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 22% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- natural choice for teams standardized on JetBrains IDEs
Choose Kiro if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (covered under AWS certification) coverage
- Publishes clear numerical credit or request allowances
- Suited to AWS-heavy enterprises needing cloud-platform integration
- Recommended as the successor to Amazon Q Developer IDE plugins
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | JetBrains AI Assistant | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.2% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #15 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 22% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JetBrains AI Assistant 0pp · Kiro 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
JetBrains AI Assistant leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | JetBrains AI Assistant | Kiro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #10 | #6 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JetBrains AI Assistant | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Plugin inside JetBrains IDEs; works only within JetBrains IDEs | Desktop IDE, command-line CLI, web browser and cloud sessions |
| Integrations | — | 500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (covered under AWS certification) |
| Support | Contact support form, Enterprise-grade support | — |
| Founded | 2000 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Seattle, Washington |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Incubator/accelerator round (Leading European Tech Scaleups) | — |
| Best for | Development teams and businesses that want AI coding help inside JetBrains IDEs | Developers and teams who want spec-driven development with AI agents, including enterprises that need IAM, SSO and governance controls |
Plans side by side
JetBrains AI Assistant
Pricing not available.
Kiro
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JetBrains AI Assistant
- natural choice for teams standardized on JetBrains IDEs
- listed among the strongest AI coding platforms
- limited trial available to eligible users
Kiro
- Publishes clear numerical credit or request allowances
- Suited to AWS-heavy enterprises needing cloud-platform integration
- Recommended as the successor to Amazon Q Developer IDE plugins
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JetBrains AI Assistant vs Kiro”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jetbrains-ai-assistant-vs-kiro, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.