JobberHome and commercial service software to quote, schedule, invoice and get paid
vs
ZuperAI Operating System for service businesses
Comparison · Field Service Management · weekly run Nov 3
Jobber vs Zuper
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Jobber is the stronger AI pick in Field Service Management: it has a visibility score of 40.3 versus 2.8 for Zuper, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Jobber if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.3 vs 2.8)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 60+)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Easy to use and dependable day-to-day operation
Choose Zuper if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 54% positive)
- Customizable workflows
- Highly configurable field operations
- Intelligent dispatching and technician coordination
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Jobber | Zuper |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 40.3% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Field Service Management | #2 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 8.8% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 44 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Jobber 0pp · Zuper 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Jobber leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
JobberZuper
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
5Jobber ranked higher
0Zuper ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Jobber | Zuper |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best field service management tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #1 | #12 |
| Best field service management software for startups | Perplexity | #1 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular field service management software | ChatGPT | #2 | #12 |
| Alternatives to the most popular field service management software | Perplexity | #2 | #16 |
| Official website of the top field service management software vendors | Perplexity | #9 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Jobber | Zuper |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $29 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based web and mobile app | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | 60+ |
| Support | Live chat, Phone support at 1-888-721-1115, Email support, Premium Support on the Plus plan | — |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | Seattle, WA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed | Series A · $46M raised |
| Best for | Home and commercial service businesses, from solo contractors to teams of 15+ and multi-location businesses | Roofing, exterior, HVAC, solar and other trade businesses that run field crews and want quoting, dispatch, job records and payments in one system |
Plans side by side
Jobber
Core$29per month, billed annually, 1 user
Connect$99per month, billed annually, 1 user
Grow$149per month, billed annually, 1 user
Plus$399per month, billed annually, 5 users
Zuper
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Jobber
- Easy to use and dependable day-to-day operation
- Covers quoting, scheduling, invoicing and customer management
- Free trial to test workflows
- Affordable starting price
- Strong ratings from a large review base
- Costlier than some alternatives
Zuper
- Customizable workflows
- Highly configurable field operations
- Intelligent dispatching and technician coordination
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Jobber vs Zuper”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jobber-vs-zuper, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.